AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PATRICIA OLIN, Plaintiff, v. MARVIN MOORE et al., Defendants. MARY C. HOLDENER, as Administratrix of the Estate of KEITH HOLDENER, Deceased, Appellant,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to Mendon Leasing Corp. and Serv-In Foods, Inc., appearing separately and filing separate briefs, payable by the appellant.

On July 12, 1986, Keith Holdener was a passenger in a car driven by the defendant Richard Salerno, which was struck by a van owned by the defendant Mendon Leasing Corp. (hereinafter Mendon Leasing) and leased by third-party defendant Serv-In Foods, Inc. (hereinafter Serv-In Foods). Instead of stopping, the driver of the van, the defendant Gregory Smalls, drove away from the scene.

Salerno pursued and eventually caught up with the van. When both vehicles stopped, Salerno exited his vehicle and punched in a window of the van. The defendant Marvin Moore, a passenger in the van, then exited the van. Following a brief altercation with Salerno, Moore approached Salerno's vehicle, where he then stabbed Keith Holdener and other occupants of Salerno's vehicle. Keith Holdener subsequently died of his injuries.

We disagree with the contentions of the administratrix of Keith Holdener's estate that the decedent's injuries and subsequent death arose out of "negligence in the use or operation" of a motor vehicle pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388. "Not every injury occurring in or near a motor vehicle is covered by the phrase `use or operation'. The accident must be connected with the use of an automobile qua automobile * * * The fact that the plaintiff was injured by an assault while riding as a passenger does not bring the claim within coverage since the use of the motor vehicle must be the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries to come within the ambit of the `use or operation' clause" (United Servs. Auto. Assn. v Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 75 A.D.2d 1022; see also, Horney v Tisyl Taxi Corp., 93 A.D.2d 291, 293; Locascio v Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co., 127 A.D.2d 746). In the present case, the decedent's injuries resulted solely from the assault by Moore, not the initial accident. His injuries, therefore, did not arise out of "negligence in the use or operation" of a motor vehicle. Lawrence, J.P., Balletta, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLIN v. MOORE
(Dec 16, 1991)