Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion without a hearing. Although defendant's motion papers allege that a hearing was required because of fraudulent misrepresentations in the warrant application (see, People v Dunn, 155 A.D.2d 75, 80, affd 77 N.Y.2d 19, cert denied ___ US ___, 111 S Ct 2830), the papers submitted by defendant in support of his motion were insufficient to raise an issue of fact concerning the veracity of the police officer making the warrant application. Accordingly, no suppression hearing was required (see, People v Slaughter, 37 N.Y.2d 596; People v. Solimine, 18 N.Y.2d 477; see also, People v. Maucieri, 125 A.D.2d 600, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 953).
We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.