Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

OLIN CORPORATION v. COLLINS et al.

PER CURIAM.

Olin Corporation (Olin) sought a determination from the Department of Revenue (Department) that it is entitled to a sales tax exemption under OCGA § 48-8-3 (35) (A) for the electricity it uses in its manufacturing plant. Olin filed a claim for refund of sales taxes previously paid on purchases of electricity. The Department denied the claim, and Olin filed an action in the superior court, as provided for in OCGA § 48-2-35 (b) (4), contesting the Department's ruling, and seeking a determination that it is entitled to the refund in question.

The trial court determined that Olin is not entitled to the refund, and entered judgment in favor of the Department. Olin filed an application for discretionary appeal to this court which was denied on July 25, 1991. Olin also filed the direct appeal before us.

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) requires an application to appeal in "[a]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of ... state ... administrative agencies...." In this case the superior court was reviewing the Department's decision pursuant to the authority of OCGA § 48-2-35 (b) (4). As such, a granted application to appeal is required to permit Olin appellate review, and the direct appeal before us must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Clarke, C. J., Weltner, P. J., Bell, Hunt, Benham and Fletcher, JJ., concur.

PER CURIAM.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 6, 1992.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OLIN CORPORATION v. COLLINS
(Feb 6, 1992)