Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUEY THRIFT, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution, we review Thrift v. State, 581 So.2d 655 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), in which the court certified as being of great public importance the same question which this Court answered in Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla. 1992). Accordingly, we disapprove the decision below to the extent that it conflicts with our opinion in Williams and remand the case for disposition in accordance with the rationale of that opinion.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J. and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

THRIFT v. STATE
(Feb 6, 1992)