AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

EDWARD P. DIBBLE, Appellant, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The order is modified by deleting the provision granting third-party defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to provide authorization for all of plaintiff's workers' compensation records and medical records. The CPLR does not contain any provision that would allow third-party defendant to obtain authorization from plaintiff to allow it access to plaintiff's workers' compensation records (see, CPLR 3102 [a]; see also, Hinrichs v Tonnssen, 128 Misc.2d 196; Bennett v Martoche, 123 Misc.2d 874, 876).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIBBLE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
(Mar 13, 1992)