AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARK BERNINGER AND CAROL BERNINGER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK, MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THEBOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK, AND JOHANNA VOGEL, DEFENDANTS, AND ELIAS NOURY ANDMARIE NOURY, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 254 N.J. Super. 401, 603 A.2d 954 (1992).

O'HERN, Justice, dissenting.

I would reverse the judgment of the Law Division, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Gaulkin's concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 254 N.J. Super. 401, 603 A.2d 954 (1992).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BERNINGER v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF BOROUGH OF MIDLAND PARK
(Mar 18, 1992)