AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of THOMAS LAROCCO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Ser

Casey, J.

Petitioner, an inmate at Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County, was subjected to routine urinalysis testing following his participation in the family reunion program (see, 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [a] [2] [ii]). Based upon the results of this testing, petitioner was charged with violating the disciplinary rule which prohibits the unauthorized use of any controlled substance. Following a hearing petitioner was found guilty of the charge, and he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination after it was administratively affirmed.

Petitioner's argument directed at the reliability of the EMIT test procedure which yielded positive results for cocaine in his urine is meritless (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 N.Y.2d 135). The documentary evidence presented at the hearing was sufficient to substantiate the required chain of custody (see, Matter of Berrios v Kuhlmann, 143 A.D.2d 475, 477), and the evidence in the record refutes petitioner's claim that he was denied the effective assistance of an employee assistant. We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them to be lacking in merit. The determination is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, supra, at 140) and it must, therefore, be confirmed.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LAROCCO v. COUGHLIN
(Mar 26, 1992)