TAFFET v. SOUTHERN CO

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 90-7088, 90-8452.

Attorney(S)

Eddie Leitman, Andrew P. Campbell, S. Lynne Stephens, Leitman, Siegal, Payne Campbell, P.C., Birmingham, Ala., Richard H. Gill, J. Fairley McDonald, III, Copeland, Franco, Screws Gill, P.A., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants. John A. Boudet, Jerry R. Linscott, Baker Hostetler, Orlando, Fla., for Taffett Fierman. Andrew M. Scherffius, Andrew M. Scherffius, P.C., A. Timothy Jones, Joseph C. Freeman, Jack N. Sibley, Freeman Hawkins, Atlanta, Ga., for Taffet, et al. Larry Moffett, Jackson Henderson Chiles, III, Daniel, Coker, Horton and Bell, P.A., Jackson, Miss., for M.R. Taffett, et al. M. Roland Nachman, Jr., T.W. Thagard, Jr., Maury D. Smith, John P. Scott, Jr., Balch Bingham, Montgomery, Ala., for Alabama Power. James E. Joiner, Hugh M. Davenport, Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman Ashmore, Atlanta, Ga., for Southern Co. M. Robert Thornton, Michael C. Russ, King Spaulding, Atlanta, Ga., for Arthur Andersen Co.

Judges

Gerald Bard Tjoflat
Peter Thorp Fay
Phyllis A. Kravitch
Joseph Woodrow Hatchett
Emmett Ripley Cox
Stanley F. Birch
Joel Fredrick Dubina
Robert Lanier Anderson
James Larry Edmondson
Frank Minis Johnson

Acts

Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Courts Of Appeals — Organization Of Courts — Assignment Of Judges; Panels; Hearings; Quorum

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

M.R. TAFFET AND ROBERT M. FIERMAN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OF THE PERSONS, CORPORATIONS, MUNICIPALITIES, AND OTHER ENTITIES, OTHER THAN THE DEFENDANTS, WHO ARE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SOUTHERN CO., SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC., ALABAMA POWER COMPANY AND ARTHUR ANDERSEN CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. FREDERICK RODGERS CARR, CARR SALES COMPANY, O.E.M. PRODUCTS, INC., TIMOTHY DUNN STOKELY, III AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Comments