ODOM v. CAROLINA CAS. INS. CO, Pa., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Wallace J. Knox, Matthew J. McLaughlin Knox, McLaughlin, Gornall Sennett, P.C., Erie, for appellant. John W. McCandless, Erie, for Keystone Ins. Co. Robert C. Ward, Erie, for Barbara Odom and Jerome Odom.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Wallace J. Knox, Matthew J. McLaughlin Knox, McLaughlin, Gornall Sennett, P.C., Erie, for appellant. John W. McCandless, Erie, for Keystone Ins. Co. Robert C. Ward, Erie, for Barbara Odom and Jerome Odom.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Barbara ODOM and Jerome Odom v. CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Keystone Insurance Company. Appeal of CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

CAPPY, J., files a concurring opinion.

CAPPY, Justice, concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the Majority in its per curiam affirmance. However, I do not agree that our decision in Azpell v. Old Republic Insurance Co., 526 Pa. 179, 584 A.2d 950 (1991) is controlling. See, Hackenberg v. Transp. Authority, 526 Pa. 358, 586 A.2d 879 (1991), (Concurring and Dissenting opinion, Cappy, J.).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.