AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PHOENIX ACQUISITION CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAMPCORE, INC., et al., Defendants, CHESTER WICKWIRE, F/N/U DYGERT, Respondent-Appellant, and MARINE MIDLAND BANK, N.A., Appellant-Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendant Wickwire in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with the court's determination to grant Wickwire summary judgment declaring that any attempt by Marine to enforce the guarantee would be time-barred. A cause of action against a surety to recover on a guarantee is governed by a six-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR 213; American Trading Co. v Fish, 42 N.Y.2d 20, 26-27) and accrues "as soon as" the debtor defaults in payment of the underlying obligation (General Phoenix Corp. v Cabot, 300 N.Y. 87, 93; see also, Gazza v United Cal. Bank Intl., 88 A.D.2d 968, 969; Chemical Bank N Y Trust Co. v Amory, 27 A.D.2d 730, affd 21 N.Y.2d 832). That rule accords with the parties' expectations in this case. The guarantee provides that Wickwire is obligated to pay the entire debt (up to $105,000) upon "any" default by the debtor. Because the debtor defaulted in paying the debt no later than April 1983, any claim to enforce the guarantee is time-barred.

Absent any countervailing equitable considerations, it was error for the court to deny costs to Wickwire, the prevailing party on the motion (see, CPLR 8101, 8301; Matter of Birnbaum v Birnbaum, 157 A.D.2d 177, 192; Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 A.D.2d 445, 446, appeal dismissed 66 N.Y.2d 741). The appeal from the stay order is rendered moot by our determination of the main appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHOENIX ACQUISITION CORP. v. CAMPCORE, INC
(Apr 24, 1992)