Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff and giving her the benefit of every reasonable inference, defendants' motion for a directed verdict was properly granted in the absence of any proof to support plaintiff's claim that defendants owed her a duty to protect her against third-party criminal activity on the premises (Iannelli v Powers, 114 A.D.2d 157, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 604). We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.