Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
After a hearing, the Family Court found, among other things, that the respondent posed no threat to the safety of the petitioner. This finding is supported by the weight of the evidence. In light of this finding of fact, and in light of all the circumstances of this case, we see no merit to the petitioner's argument that the respondent should be permanently barred from every part of the marital residence (see generally, Chieco v. Chieco, 170 A.D.2d 569; cf., Merola v. Merola, 146 A.D.2d 611).
We have examined the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.