Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent v. HITMAN, INC.,Mark D. Axler, Sherry A. Axler, NCNB South Carolina, Of whom Hitman Inc.,is Petitioner, and Chris Construction Company is, Inter

Submitted April 20, 1992.

Decided May 26, 1992.

Per Curiam:

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals in First Union National Bank of South Carolina v. Hitman, et al., ___ S.C. ___, 411 S.E.2d 681 (Ct.App. 1991). We affirm.

The sole question before us is whether a trial judge commits reversible error by issuing a written order which is in conflict with his prior oral ruling from the bench. We agree with the analysis of the Court of Appeals, and hold that a judge is not bound by the prior oral ruling and may issue a written order which is in conflict with the oral ruling. To the extent McCranie v. Davis, 278 S.C. 513, 299 S.E.2d 338 (1983), is inconsistent with this opinion, it is overruled. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FIRST UNION NAT'L BANK OF S.C. v. HITMAN, INC
(May 26, 1992)