Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL McCRAY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

On pleas of guilty to three counts of sale of cocaine, the defendant was sentenced to concurrent terms of three and one-half years imprisonment, followed by ten years probation. The incarcerative term did not exceed the guidelines, and the total period of imprisonment and probation was within the fifteen year maximum for the offense in question. §§ 775.082(3)(c), 893.13(1)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (1991). Contrary to appellant's suggestion, therefore, the sentence as a whole was not a guidelines departure and was otherwise entirely proper. Mitchell v. State, 573 So.2d 446 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); State v. Lindsey, 560 So.2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Tyner v. State, 545 So.2d 961 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); see Putt v. State, 527 So.2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McCRAY v. STATE
(Jun 2, 1992)