WILLIAMS v. HATTAN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 90-1027.

Attorney(S)

J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, for plaintiff-
Roy Hattan, L. Lane Roy, Allen, Gooch, Wm. H. Parker III, Martin, Taulbee, Howard W. Martin, Lafayette, Keogh, Cox, John P. Wolff, Baton Rouge, for defendants-

Judges

DOUCET, Judge.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 90-1027.

Attorney(S)

J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, for plaintiff-
Roy Hattan, L. Lane Roy, Allen, Gooch, Wm. H. Parker III, Martin, Taulbee, Howard W. Martin, Lafayette, Keogh, Cox, John P. Wolff, Baton Rouge, for defendants-

Judges

DOUCET, Judge.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CLIFTON WILLIAMS, SR. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. M. CANDICE HATTAN HOWARD W. MARTIN; J. MINOS SIMON (3RD PARTY DEMAND OF HATTAN WITH CROSS CLAIM); MILES TILLEY (CROSS CLAIM OF HATTAN); CLIFTON WILLIAMS, SR. (RECONVENTIONAL DEMAND OF HATTAN) DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

DOUCET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Williams v. Hattan, 594 So.2d 977 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1992), rendered this day, the judgment appealed is REVERSED AND REMANDED in accordance with the views expressed in the companion appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CLIFTON WILLIAMS, SR. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. M. CANDICE HATTAN HOWARD W. MARTIN; J. MINOS SIMON (3RD PARTY DEMAND OF HATTAN WITH CROSS CLAIM); MILES TILLEY (CROSS CLAIM OF HATTAN); CLIFTON WILLIAMS, SR. (RECONVENTIONAL DEMAND OF HATTAN) DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

Comments