Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EXETER ENERGY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. OFFICE OF POLICY AND MANAGEMENT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing this case pursuant to Practice Book 251 for the failure of the plaintiff's counsel to appear at an administrative appeals scheduling calendar. On appeal, the plaintiff also challenges the trial court's postjudgment denial of his motion to restore the case to the docket, which motion was filed within the appeal period.

We note that at the time of the dismissal the pleadings were not yet closed in this case. It was not a case "appearing on an assignment list for final adjudication," and, therefore, it should not have been dismissed without a hearing on the matter, as required by Practice Book 251. Since a review of the record indicates that no hearing was held prior to dismissal of the case, the trial court's judgment of dismissal cannot stand.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EXETER ENERGY LTD. PARTS. v. OFFICE OF POLICY
(Jun 16, 1992)