AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of RICKEY MOORE, Appellant, v. ARTHUR LEONARDO, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Casey, J.Page 490

Petitioner, an inmate at Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Washington County, instituted this CPLR article 78 proceeding to compel medical care and treatment above and beyond that which he is presently receiving, which he deems inadequate. In the alternative, petitioner seeks his release from imprisonment.

It appears that petitioner was seen by the facility's medical staff approximately 23 times between September 4, 1990 and August 5, 1991. During this period he was given blood, urine and stool analysis tests and X rays, all of which showed no abnormalities. He was diagnosed as having a spastic colon with symptoms of abdominal pain, cramps, nausea and diarrhea, and various medicines were prescribed from time to time. Based on the diagnosis and treatment, petitioner has failed to show that respondents were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need (see, Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97; Matter of Stephens v Ward, 63 A.D.2d 798), which is the burden that petitioner must meet in order to succeed on his claim (see, Matter of Ronson v Commissioner of Correction, State of N.Y., 112 A.D.2d 488, 489). His failure to meet that burden required dismissal of the petition and, therefore, we affirm Supreme Court's judgment.

Weiss, P.J., Levine, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MOORE v. LEONARDO
(Jul 16, 1992)