AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of JO ANN P. MROZ, Appellant, v. CAROLYN B. MALONEY, Respondent, and BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court that personal service was not properly made upon the candidate pursuant to the order to show cause. Moreover, were we to reach the merits of the case, we would find that the cover sheets of the designating petition complied with Election Law § 6-134, and the rules promulgated by the Board of Elections (see, Matter of Hirschfeld v. Green, 185 A.D.2d 959 [decided herewith]; see also, L 1992, ch 79). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MROZ v. MALONEY
(Aug 25, 1992)