Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Jose GARZA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

A court convicted appellant, Jose Garza, of Burglary of a building. See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 30.02(a)(1) (Vernon 1974). At the time of this conviction appellant was on court supervised deferred adjudication probation. After the conviction, the State filed a motion to adjudicate appellant guilty and terminate his probation. The trial court granted the motion. Appellant challenges this ruling. We dismiss this appeal.

Appellant's argument on appeal is that his conviction for burglary should be reversed, thus the trial court erred in adjudicating him guilty in his prior plea and revoking his probation. We do not reach this question.

The trial court's decision to adjudicate guilt is not reviewable on appeal under TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 42.12 CODE CRIM.P. s5(b) (Vernon 1990). Phynes v. State, 828 S.W.2d 1 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992); Olowosuko v. State, 826 S.W.2d 940, 942 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992).

This appeal is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GARZA v. STATE
(Aug 31, 1992)