AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUDOLF "RUDY" ROGLER, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record and consideration of the relevant factors (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 A.D.2d 325, 333-334, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 N.Y.2d 625), we find no abuse of discretion in the court's denial of defendant's application for youthful offender status (see, People v New, 171 A.D.2d 1006, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 998; People v Ortega, 114 A.D.2d 912, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 887). Further, we decline to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice to grant him that status (cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 A.D.2d 929, 930). Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROGLER
(Oct 7, 1992)