AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

IRA WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. ENVELOPE TRANSIT CORP. et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

On the night of August 27, 1987, the plaintiff was driving his vehicle on the Manhattan Bridge when he noticed that a taxi, owned by the defendant Envelope Transit Corp. and operated by the defendant Yves St. Pierre, had stalled in the left lane. The plaintiff stopped his car behind the taxi and walked over to it. He spoke to St. Pierre and, after determining that he could not render any assistance, he returned to his car and got in. Immediately thereafter, a car driven by the third-party defendant Richard Tauber hydroplaned on the slightly wet pavement and ran into the rear of the plaintiff's car, causing it to go forward and strike the taxi. On this record, the court erred in denying the motion for summary judgment brought on by the defendants. While the stalling of the defendants' taxi may have furnished the occasion for the accident, it was not one of its causes (see, Rogers v Huggins, 106 A.D.2d 621, 622; see also, Benyarko v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 162 A.D.2d 572; see also, Dunlap v City of New York, 186 A.D.2d 782 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. ENVELOPE TRANSIT CORP
(Oct 26, 1992)