SCHMOLL v. ACANDS INC

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 89-35101, 89-35168.

Attorney(S)

William N. Reed, H. Mitchell Cowan, J. Randall Patterson, Watkins Ludlam Stennis, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant. Henry Kantor, Jeffrey S. Mutnick, Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary Conboy, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Judges

Robert R. Beezer
John T. Noonan
Stephen S. Trott

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 89-35101, 89-35168.

Attorney(S)

William N. Reed, H. Mitchell Cowan, J. Randall Patterson, Watkins Ludlam Stennis, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant. Henry Kantor, Jeffrey S. Mutnick, Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary Conboy, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Judges

Robert R. Beezer
John T. Noonan
Stephen S. Trott

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

RAYMOND A. SCHMOLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ACANDS, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND RAYTECH CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. RAYMOND A. SCHMOLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

ORDER

Under Oregon law, creditors have priority over shareholders in all of the future earnings of an insolvent corporation. We have reviewed the record in No. 89-35168 and we affirm the district court's judgment on the grounds stated in its opinion. Schmoll v. ACandS; Inc., 703 F. Supp. 868 (D.Or. 1988).

We dismiss Raytech's appeal of an interlocutory order in No. 89-35101.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

RAYMOND A. SCHMOLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ACANDS, INC., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND RAYTECH CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. RAYMOND A. SCHMOLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

Comments