Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

EVELYN ARES, Indi v. dually and as Administratrix of the Estate of RAFAEL ARES, Deceased, Appellant,

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Gerard Weisberg, J. Sullivan Liapakis, P.C., New York City (Cheryl Eisberg Moin and Pamela Anagnos Liapakis of counsel), for appellant.

White, Fleischner, Fino Wade, New York City (Benjamin A. Fleischner and Lynn J. Hershkovits of counsel), for New York State Thruway Authority, respondent.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General, Albany (Jerry Boone of counsel), for State of New York, respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division erred in concluding that Labor Law § 241 (6) applies only to work in connection with the construction or demolition of buildings and not to the highway construction project involved here (see, Mosher v State of New York, 80 N.Y.2d 286 [decided today]). Nevertheless, the claimant's cause of action under that section was properly dismissed. The record supports the Court of Claims conclusion that claimant failed to establish that a violation of a safety regulation promulgated pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) was the proximate cause of the accident.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur; Judge SMITH taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARES v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Oct 29, 1992)