AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD CAREY, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant had the right to be present during the Sandoval hearing (see, People v Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656), the record supports a finding that defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to be present (see, People v Parker, 57 N.Y.2d 136, 140; cf., People v Gaines, 144 A.D.2d 941). Defendant has failed to preserve for our review his contention that comments made by the prosecutor during summation deprived him of a fair trial (see, CPL 470.05), and we decline to reach that issue in the interest of justice (see, People v Demott, 178 A.D.2d 935, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 946). In any event, the comments represented a fair response to the summation of defense counsel (see, People v Price, 144 A.D.2d 1013, lv denied 73 N.Y.2d 895).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CAREY
(Nov 18, 1992)