Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BRIAN BOYD SPENCER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Brian Spencer appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant alleged five different grounds for relief in his motion, including a claim that the trial court failed to advise him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea. On appeal he seeks relief on this claim based on an appellate immigration decision finding him deportable because of the convictions in this matter.

We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing as to this claim based on this court's recent holding in Marriott v. State, 605 So.2d 985 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(viii) renders it mandatory for the trial judge to instruct all defendants in all cases regarding possible immigration consequences. We affirm the trial court's summary denial of the remaining grounds alleged in appellant's motion.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPENCER v. STATE
(Nov 18, 1992)