Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE v. McCOLLUM et al.

FLETCHER, Justice.

In State v. McCollum, 261 Ga. 473 ( 405 S.E.2d 688) (1991), a majority of this court affirmed the trial court's decision refusing to prohibit the defendants in the action below from exercising their peremptory strikes in a racially discriminatory manner. The Supreme Court of the United States reversed that decision, holding that:

[T]he Constitution [of the United States] prohibits a criminal defendant from engaging in purposeful discrimination on the ground of race in the exercise of peremptory challenges. Accordingly, if the State demonstrates a prima facie case of racial discrimination by the defendants, the defendants, must articulate a racially neutral explanation for peremptory challenges.
Georgia v. McCollum, ___ U.S. ___ ( 112 S.C. 2348, 2359, 120 L.Ed.2d 33) (1992).

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, the former judgment of this court in the case is vacated and the decision of the trial court is reversed. Direction is given to the trial court to proceed consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Judgment reversed with direction. Clarke, C. J., Bell, P. J., Hunt, Benham and Sears-Collins, JJ., concur.

FLETCHER, Justice.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 23, 1992.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. McCOLLUM
(Nov 23, 1992)