AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KENNETH RADOLINSKI et al., Respondents, v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO., Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And Two Third-Party Actions.)

Whether or not adequate circumstances have been shown to support discovery against a nonparty is generally a determination resting within the sound discretion of the court to which the application is made (Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 N.Y.2d 1031, 1032). In this case, the movant has offered no reason why an assessment of plaintiff's physical condition cannot be made in the usual way from an evaluation of the medical findings (see, D'Amico v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 182 A.D.2d 462), or that the information sought cannot be obtained from other sources (Dioguardi v St. John's Riverside Hosp., 144 A.D.2d 333, 334). Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion in the motion court's denial of the application.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RADOLINSKI v. OTIS ELEVATOR CO
(Dec 1, 1992)