AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PANDORA INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

The IAS Court correctly held that plaintiff cannot recover on its policy with defendant because of its failure to notify defendant of the loss as soon as practicable (see, Heydt Constr. Corp. v American Home Assur. Co., 146 A.D.2d 497, lv dismissed 74 N.Y.2d 651). Plaintiff's good faith belief that the loss was not covered does not excuse the late notice, which was not received until 31 days after the initial loss and after the offending elbow pipe had been replaced and the damaged stock removed.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PANDORA INDUS. v. ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INS
(Dec 1, 1992)