Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIE EUGENE PITTS, A MINOR BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, MRS. ANNA MAE PITTS, VICTOR MARTIN; A MINOR, BY HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND ROBERT L. MARTIN; KELVIN, FELICIA, ALFRED, ORMA, AND ALFREDIA HENDERSON, MINORS, BY THEIR MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, REBECCA HENDERSON, PATRICIA JOYCE REEVES, A MINOR, BY HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, MRS. ROSA LEE REEVES; ANTHONY REED AND CECILIA SEARCY, MINORS, BY THEIR MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, MRS. JUANITA SEARCY; NED AND BECKY STONE, MINORS, BY THEIR FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ALFRED E. STONE, JR.; JOY, BRIDGETT AND SANDRA BECKER, MINORS, BY THEIR FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, LOUIS E. BECKER; MONICA ROCKER, A MINOR, BY HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ARTHUR "ROCK" ROCKER; JOHN JOHNSON AND DEVETT SMITH, MINORS, BY THEIR MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND, MS. EUNICE A. SMITH; FRANKIE PRATHER, A MINOR, BY GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, CYNTHIA SCOTT, AND HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, MAJOR SCOTT; PRINCESS MILLS, A MINOR, BY HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ROGER MILLS; MARK ANTHONY WHARTON, A MINOR, BY HIS MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND DORIS PATILLAR; AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-APPELLEES, VALENCIA MILLS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, ASHLEY AND B'RANDI ARMSTRONG, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENORS, v. ROBERT FREEMAN, SUPERINTENDENT, LYMAN HOWARD, NORMA TRAVIS, AND PHIL McGREGOR, DeKALB COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, CROSS-APPELLANTS. WILLIE EUGENE PITTS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-APPELLEES, VALENCIA MILLS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, ASHLEY AND B'RANDI ARMSTRONG, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-INTERVENORS,

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before us as a result of a remand from the Supreme Court. Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1430, 118 L.Ed.2d 108 (1992). In accord with the Court's opinion, we affirm the order of the district court entered on June 30, 1988 and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with that opinion.

The issues to be considered by the district court should include, but not necessarily be limited to, faculty and staff assignments (which may or may not involve a reexamination of student assignments), resource allocation, the quality of education being received by all students and the good faith commitment of the school district.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PITTS v. FREEMAN
(Dec 7, 1992)