Petitioner challenges the promulgation of regulations imposing a surcharge upon a finding that an inmate is guilty of violating disciplinary rules after certain types of disciplinary proceedings. An administrative body promulgating such regulations acts in a legislative capacity (see, Matter of Timber Point Homes v County of Suffolk, 155 A.D.2d 671, 674). Prohibition is unavailable where, as here, the challenge is to an administrative body's legislative-type actions (see, Matter of American Tr. Ins. Co. v Corcoran, 65 N.Y.2d 828, 830). Given the ability of petitioner to raise the validity of the regulations in an administrative appeal and by way of a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 if they are ever applied to him, we find no reason here to convert this proceeding to a declaratory judgment action (see, Matter of City of Newburgh v Public Empl. Relations Bd., 63 N.Y.2d 793; Bower Gardner v Evans, 60 N.Y.2d 781).
Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mahoney and Harvey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.