Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Eddie Bernard NEAL v. STATE.

McMILLAN, Judge.

On August 5, 1992, the appellant filed a petition pursuant to Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., in the circuit court of Jefferson County. The petition was accompanied by an in forma pauperis declaration and a copy of the petitioner's prison account, which indicated that his balance as of July 23, 1991, was $100.16. The trial court thereafter denied in forma pauperis status, stating that the defendant had indicated in his petition that he had access to funds to pay the required filing fee.

Under Rule 20, A.R.Cr.P., Temp., the predecessor of Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., no filing fee was required in order to prosecute a petition for relief. Rule 20 applies to petitions in which the underlying case was commenced prior to 12:01 a.m. on January 1, 1991, the effective date of Rule 32. Hawkins v. State, 587 So.2d 1290 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991). The original conviction in the present case occurred in 1982. Therefore, pursuant to Hawkins, the judgment of the trial court must be reversed. This cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to docket the appellant's petition and process it in accordance with the provisions of Rule 20, A.R.Cr.P. Temp.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEAL v. STATE
(Dec 4, 1992)