AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PEARLETTA BROOKS, Respondent, v. SAMUEL J. LEFRAK, Doing Business as SHALIMAR LEASING CO., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. SAMUEL J. LEFRAK et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Motions to consolidate pursuant to CPLR 602 (a) are addressed to the sound discretion of the court, "subject to the general rule that, in the absence of special circumstances, where the actions have been commenced in different counties venue should be placed in the county having jurisdiction over the action first commenced" (T T Enters. v Gralnick, 127 A.D.2d 651, 652). Movant's showing with respect to the convenience of witnesses was insufficient to overcome this general rule. The convenience of the parties and their employees is not to be considered (Coles v LaGuardia Med. Group, 161 A.D.2d 166), and it is hardly an inconvenience to require a witness to travel from Queens to the Bronx, a bus or subway ride away (see, Rodriguez v Ryder Truck Rental, 100 A.D.2d 811).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROOKS v. LEFRAK
(Dec 10, 1992)