Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERTO CRUZ, Also Known as JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The trial court improperly conducted a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371) in defendant's absence, requiring a new trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 N.Y.2d 656; People v Gebrosky, 80 N.Y.2d 995). It is therefore unnecessary to consider defendant's remaining contention.

Acting Chief Judge SIMONS and Judges KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur in memorandum; Judge SMITH taking no part.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CRUZ
(Dec 17, 1992)