AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

LISA LEFKOW, Respondent, v. PETER LEFKOW, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well established that voluntary payments made by a parent for the benefit of children and not pursuant to a court order may not be credited against amounts owing under the order (see, Horne v Horne, 22 N.Y.2d 219; Kerpen v Kerpen, 172 A.D.2d 496; O'Brien v O'Brien, 136 A.D.2d 531; Fabrizio v Fabrizio, 125 A.D.2d 634; Soltow v Soltow, 47 A.D.2d 652). The defendant husband herein submitted various canceled checks but failed to establish that they were intended to represent payments owing under the pendente lite order. None was in the court-ordered amount of $400 per week. Thus, the court properly refused to credit the husband with these voluntary payments. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEFKOW v. LEFKOW
(Dec 21, 1992)