Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's initial contention that the prosecutor's failure to provide the full contents of a police witness' crime report amounted to a Rosario violation and warrants both a new Huntley hearing and a new trial is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v. Rivera, 78 N.Y.2d 901, 903; see also, People v. Rogelio, 79 N.Y.2d 843, 844; People v. Rashid, 164 A.D.2d 951).
Furthermore, the defendant's contentions with respect to the prosecutor's summation comments are largely unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951; People v. Martin, 149 A.D.2d 534, 535). Those comments to which any claims of error were preserved for appellate review constituted fair response to the defense counsel's summation (see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Sykes, 151 A.D.2d 523, 524; People v. Miller, 143 A.D.2d 1055; People v Walters, 116 A.D.2d 757, 758). Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.