MATTER OF RUTGERS v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Paul Schachter argued the cause for appellant ( Reinhardt Schachter, attorneys). Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Public Employment Relations
John B. Wolf argued the cause for respondent Rutgers, The State

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Paul Schachter argued the cause for appellant ( Reinhardt Schachter, attorneys). Robert E. Anderson, General Counsel, argued the cause for respondent Public Employment Relations
John B. Wolf argued the cause for respondent Rutgers, The State

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 256 N.J. Super. 104, 606 A.2d 822 (1992).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MATTER OF RUTGERS v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS

IN THE MATTER OF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, v. RUTGERS COUNCIL OF AAUP CHAPTERS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Comments