AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

AHMED SHEHATA, Respondent, v. SUSHIDEN AMERICAN, INC., et al., Defendants, et al., Third-Party Plaintiff. TAKASHIMAYA, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

A comparison of the medical reports and bills of particulars with the reports served less than thirty days before the scheduled trial date, which third-party defendant asserts violated the medical exchange provisions of the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts ( 22 NYCRR 202.17 [g], [h]), indicates that, save for one injury for which plaintiff makes no claim, notice of all of the alleged new injuries previously appeared in timely-served medical reports. In any event, reported observations such as that plaintiff was unable to climb stairs or write for any length of time do not constitute a prognosis, nor set forth new "injuries or conditions", but rather detail the functional consequences of previously reported injuries or conditions.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHEHATA v. SUSHIDEN AMERICAN, INC
(Feb 23, 1993)