AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CHARLES REMBAR, Appellant, v. DANIEL ROSE et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In determining the applicable period of limitations for a declaratory judgment action, the court is to consider whether "the underlying dispute can be or could have been resolved through a form of action or proceeding for which a specific limitation period is statutorily provided," which period would then govern the declaratory judgment action (Matter of Save the Pine Bush v. City of Albany, 70 N.Y.2d 193, 202; Koeppel v Wachtler, 141 A.D.2d 613, 615). It is clear that the action at bar is essentially one wherein the plaintiff is challenging the issuance by the Village's zoning board of a special permit to the defendants. The proper procedural vehicle to make this challenge was a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, governed in this instance by a 30-day Statute of Limitations (see, Village Law § 7-712). Since the action was not commenced within that period, it was properly dismissed. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, O'Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REMBAR v. ROSE
(Mar 8, 1993)