AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree arising from an incident which occurred on September 4, 1990, when the defendant and another forcibly stole $800 from the complainant at the intersection of Broadway and Stockdon Street in Brooklyn. Three days later, the complainant spotted the defendant on the street and contacted the police. Shortly thereafter, the complainant positively identified the defendant to the police and the defendant was arrested.

The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court allowed the prosecution to introduce the defendant's Grand Jury testimony as part of the case-in-chief. However, the defendant did not object to the admission of his Grand Jury testimony at trial, and thus the claimed evidentiary error is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Donovan, 59 N.Y.2d 834). In any event, the Grand Jury testimony was properly admitted as an admission by the defendant (see, People v. Koestler, 176 A.D.2d 1207).

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ
(Mar 15, 1993)