Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARK VINCENT

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 249 (AC 10688), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the search warrant application stated probable cause to believe that a crime had been committed?

"2. Was the Appellate Court correct in not deciding (1) whether the seizure of the revolver, the subject of the prosecution, was `inadvertent' under the `plain view' exception to the warrant requirement, and (2) whether the Connecticut constitution requires `inadvertence' under the `plain view' exception even if the United States constitution does not?"

Michael K. Courtney, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Leah Hawley, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. VINCENT
(Mar 25, 1993)