Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Smart Summary

Summary of Opinion: UNITED STATES v. GREEN (No. 91-1521)

Factual and Procedural Background

This case was an application for a writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Docket No. 91-1521). The Court had previously entered an order granting the writ of certiorari (cited in the opinion as 504 U.S. 908 (1992)). The respondent died in Washington, D.C., on March 24, 1993. As a result of the respondent's death, the Supreme Court vacated its prior order granting certiorari and dismissed the petition for certiorari. The opinion notes that the case as reported below is found at 592 A.2d 985.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
504 U.S. 908 (1992) Reference to the Court's prior order granting the writ of certiorari. The Court identified that its prior order granting certiorari (504 U.S. 908) was in effect, and then vacated that order in light of the respondent's death.
Mintzes v. Buchanon, 471 U.S. 154 (1985) Authority for vacating a grant of certiorari and dismissing a petition when the respondent dies. The Court cited Mintzes v. Buchanon as controlling authority to vacate its order granting certiorari and to dismiss the petition for certiorari because the respondent had died.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court's analysis is concise and procedural. Upon being advised that the respondent died in Washington, D.C., on March 24, 1993, the Court concluded that its prior order granting the writ of certiorari should be vacated and that the petition for certiorari should be dismissed. The Court relied on its precedent in Mintzes v. Buchanon, 471 U.S. 154 (1985), as the controlling authority for this action. The opinion contains no extended factual or legal discussion beyond this procedural application of precedent, and it concludes with the statement, "It is so ordered."

Holding and Implications

ORDER GRANTING THE WRIT OF CERTIORARI VACATED; PETITION FOR CERTIORARI DISMISSED.

Consequences: The direct effect of the Court's action is that the Supreme Court's prior grant of certiorari in this matter is vacated and the petition for certiorari is dismissed due to the respondent's death. The opinion does not announce or establish any new legal rule beyond applying existing precedent (Mintzes v. Buchanon) to the procedural circumstance presented, and it does not discuss broader implications beyond the case-specific disposition.

UNITED STATES v. GREEN

PER CURIAM.

The Court is advised that the respondent died in Washington, D.C., on March 24, 1993. The Court's order granting the writ of certiorari, see 504 U.S. 908 (1992), therefore is vacated, and the petition for certiorari is dismissed. See Mintzes v. Buchanon, 471 U.S. 154 (1985).

It is so ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. GREEN
(Apr 5, 1993)