Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Attorney(S) Noel S. Tonneman argued the cause for appellants ( Wilentz, Goldman Spitzer, attorneys; Warren W. Wilentz, of counsel; Mr. Tonneman, on the brief). John A. Craner argued the cause for respondent ( Craner, Nelson, Satkin Scheer, attorneys; Mr. Craner, on the brief). Judges PER CURIAM. See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. JOYCE CARR, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ARTHUR W. BURGESS, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF H. THOMAS CARR, BARBARA CARR, MICHAEL T. CARR, KATHLEEN P. CARR AND TIMOTHY F. CARR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND BERLY INVESTMENT CO.; LESLIE GRABOWSKI, JEFFREY KIRSCH, ROBERT ELKINS, RAYMOND BUCK AND AQUAMARINE DEVELOPMENT, INC., INTERVENORS. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Epstein in his opinion reported at 264 N.J. Super. 191, 623 A.2d 1384 (Ch.Div. 1993). We are satisfied that the findings of fact are supported by substantial credible evidence in the record and find no sound reason or justification to interfere with them. See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474 , 484, 323 A.2d 495 (1974).