AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM QUINONES, Appellant.

Defendant's conviction arises from his arrest in connection with the multiple stabbing and bludgeoning of a homeless man in a Manhattan park. Viewing the evidence at trial in the light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), defendant's guilt of the crime charged was amply supported (People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Evidence of unknown individuals hurrying from the scene of the murder, and defendant's contradictory statements made to the police, were properly placed before the jury. Its determinations of credibility and fact, not unreasonable, will not be disturbed by this Court (People v Gruttola, 43 N.Y.2d 116, 122).

Following a finding that defendant was mentally fit to stand trial, the pro se hearing court duly conducted a searching inquiry to determine whether defendant's decision to waive counsel and proceed pro se was knowing and intelligent. Defendant's responses to the court indicated that he understood the nature of the charges against him, as well as the risks involved in his decision to waive counsel. Thus, the hearing court properly granted defendant's application to represent himself (People v Reason, 37 N.Y.2d 351, 356). We find nothing in defendant's conduct during trial to suggest that he, in fact, lacked the capacity to proceed pro se, with assistance of counsel accepted during various portions of the trial (supra).

The record supports the suppression court's findings that defendant voluntarily accompanied the police to the precinct for the anticipated purpose of assisting in the investigation of the murder, and that when defendant's status changed to that of a suspect, he voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived the Miranda rights (People v Rivera, 68 N.Y.2d 786, affg 121 A.D.2d 166).

We have considered defendant's additional arguments and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, or meritless.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. QUINONES
(Apr 15, 1993)