AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ROYAL ZENITH CORPORATION, Appellant, v. NEW YORK MARINE MANAGERS, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

The IAS Court, properly determined that defendant insurers were not liable under the policy of insurance sued upon for the alleged damages sought by the plaintiff to its printing presses stored at the warehouse of the insured, Willmac Warehouse and Distribution Center, Inc. ("Willmac"), where, as here, the loss in question was specifically excluded from coverage under the policy by the express exclusion for damage to property caused by atmospheric conditions, and where the insured, Willmac, had violated the policy terms and conditions by voluntarily assuming liability by stipulation of settlement without the defendant insurers' written consent.

Plaintiff's action on the unsatisfied judgment against Willmac pursuant to Insurance Law § 3420 was therefore properly dismissed since the plaintiff, as a judgment-creditor, stands in the shoes of the insured and may recover under the policy only to the extent that the insured would be entitled to indemnification coverage (Matter of Nassau Ins. Co. [Bergen — Supt. of Ins.], 161 A.D.2d 146, 147, affd 78 N.Y.2d 888; Holmes v Allstate Ins. Co., 33 A.D.2d 96, 98), and since "even in cases of negotiated settlements, there can be no duty to indemnify unless there is first a covered loss" (Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. Co., 64 N.Y.2d 419, 423).

We have reviewed the plaintiff's remaining claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROYAL ZENITH v. NEW YORK MARINE MANAGERS
(Apr 15, 1993)