Defendant's contention that the sentencing court deprived him of an adequate opportunity to secure the minutes related to his predicate felony conviction is without merit. The court granted an extended period of time to counsel, who had assured the court that the minutes could be secured. At the plea proceeding, defendant made all Boykin waivers, acknowledged that he was pleading voluntarily and knowingly, and that no promises had been made. Defendant also acknowledged the range of sentences which could be imposed, depending on whether or not he controverted the predicate felony statement. Counsel's conclusory claim, at the adjourned sentencing proceeding, that the relevant minutes had been misplaced by the court reporter, was an insufficient basis to permit the defendant to withdraw his plea, or to be sentenced as a first felony offender. Nor were defendant's bare conclusory allegations of a constitutional infirmity in the predicate felony conviction sufficient to carry his burden of demonstrating that the prior conviction was unconstitutionally obtained (see, People v Spencer, 32 N.Y.2d 446, 450; People v Thompson, 140 A.D.2d 652). It has been noted that "it defies logic to presume from the mere unavailability of a transcript * * * that the defendant was not advised of his rights" (Parke v Raley, 506 US ___, ___, 113 S Ct 517, 524). Nor was it improvident for the court to impose sentence on the adjourned date, particularly in view of prior accommodations which had been made to defendant (see, People v Fox, 117 A.D.2d 818).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Wallach and Asch, JJ.