Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TROY WATSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, AND BROWN ROOT, U.S.A., INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. ROBERT ADAMS, SR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion December 7, 1992, 5 Cir., 1992, 979 F.2d 1014)

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WATSON v. SHELL OIL CO
(Apr 28, 1993)