AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DONALD KEENAN et al., Respondents, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND Co. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that the purpose of a bill of particulars is to amplify the pleadings, limit the proof, and prevent surprise at trial (see, Ferrigno v General Motors Corp., 134 A.D.2d 479). The statement set forth in the plaintiffs' supplemental bill of particulars sufficiently particularized the specific acts of negligence which gave rise to the asserted defect (see, Moore v Chrysler Corp., 100 A.D.2d 955). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KEENAN v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO
(May 17, 1993)