AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IRVING ORTIZ, Appellant.

Defendant, along with his co-perpetrator, was apprehended moments after the two had brutally beat the victim on the head with a metal pipe and stole money and personal items. The victim, approaching the perpetrators on his own, made an immediate and positive prompt, confirmatory identification. Shortly afterward, the victim's ring was recovered from defendant's mouth.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, under the standards set forth in People v. Bleakley ( 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495), defendant's guilt was proved beyond a reasonable doubt by overwhelming, legally sufficient evidence, and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. We find no basis to disturb the hearing court's conclusion that the identification was neither police arranged nor suggestive. (People v. Muhammad, 159 A.D.2d 266, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 740.) When the court personally confirmed that a sworn juror, in this two-day trial, was sick with the flu and was unlikely to be available for continued service (CPL 270.35), the court carefully set forth its conclusions as well as the basis therefor on the record. Despite defendant's refusal to consent to the substitution of this sworn juror, we find no basis to disturb the court's exercise of discretion (see, People v. Rivera, 172 A.D.2d 570, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 926). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Milonas, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ORTIZ
(Jun 3, 1993)