AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DEBRA McCLEARY, Respondent, v. ISIDOR HEFTER, Defendant, and RICHARD J. BRADY et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the defendants Richard J. Brady and Lione Express, Inc., and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

Any assessment of the "significance" of a bodily limitation necessarily requires consideration not only of the extent or degree of the limitation but of its duration as well (Partlow v Meehan, 155 A.D.2d 647). In this case, the report of Dr. Wani, which indicated that the plaintiff's range of motion was normal less than three months after the accident, negated any claim of significant limitation (Partlow v. Meehan, supra; see also, Thrall v. City of Syracuse, 60 N.Y.2d 950). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McCLEARY v. HEFTER
(Jun 7, 1993)