Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. RUSSELL CARINO, AND DAVID RUSHING, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION

We grant the motion and certify as questions of great public importance those certified in State v. Nevadomski, 619 So.2d 310 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD, J., concur.

HERSEY, J., dissents without opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CARINO
(Jun 9, 1993)